A Place for Truth
Studies

Background of the New Testament Period

 

Epistles in the Ancient World

The Greek word ‘epistole’ (“epistle” or “letter”) originally referred to an oral communication sent by a messenger.  The term letters was a broad designation for different types of documents in the ancient world, and could include a great variety of commercial, governmental and legal documents, as well as political and military reports, along with other sorts of correspondence, especially of a personal kind.  Paul adapted the Greco-Roman letter models for Christian purposes.  His letters, which have fascinated people for generations, were usually constructed along lines similar to that of Hellenistic letters.  But the apostle, who has a sense of freedom in literary matters, was not tied to fixed models, and he often combined non-Jewish Hellenistic customs with Hellenistic Jewish ones.[1]

 

The Form of an Epistle

The Form of the Pauline Letters:  The general model of the Hellenistic letter included an opening, a body and a closing.  The basic Pauline letter form, in which there was a normal progression rather than any stereotyped or mechanical framework, contained the following elements: Opening- “Grace and Peace”, indications of his apostolic authority sent from Jesus Christ; Introductory Thanksgiving or Blessing- Paul gave thanks to God in comparison to the Hellenistic epistolary model which gave thanks to their own personal gods; The Body- The apostle used very much his own style in the body of the letters; Closing- Paul used the typical closing greetings of Hellenistic letters in order to link the congregations with his own traveling ministry.  He ended with a benediction and doxology.[2]

 

The persuasive modes of the classical rhetorical handbooks were well known during Paul’s day, and one did not have to be formally trained in rhetoric to use them.  Each type of speech could consist of four elements:

 

1) Exordium (introduction)

2) Narratio (statement of facts)

3) Probatio (argument)

4) Peroratio (conclusion)[3]

 

The Making of Books

Literature in the pre-Christian centuries employed the papyrus scroll; from the fourth century AD it was commonly preserved on the parchment codex.  The preparation and use of the Egyptian papyrus plant for a writing material is described by Pliny the Elder in Natural History 13.68-83.

 

Parchment was made from skins of sheep or goats, and vellum from the skins of calves.  The skins were washed, scraped to remove hairs, rubbed with pumice stone to make them smooth, and dressed with chalk. 

The universal form of a book in ancient times was the roll (Lat. Volumen).  Papyrus rolls were made by gluing sheets of papyrus together.

 

The codex or book form (liber, libellus) originated with binding wax-covered wood tablets together with rings or leather cords.  The word codex is from caudex, a trunk of a tree, and then a block of wood.  The codex proved its usefulness for Christians- - it was more compact because it permitted writing on both sides; it gave easier reference; and it was better suited to a collection of volumes.

 

Zenodotus of Ephesus, one of the librarians at Alexandria, invented textual criticism by comparing manuscripts.  The Alexandrian scholars handed down the texts of the Greek classics and introduced accentuation.  They laid the foundation of philology.

 

Inscriptions and Papyri

The inscriptions and papyri have a twofold importance for the student of Christianity: 1. The provide much of the source material for the history, customs and daily life of the times, and 2. They provide primary data for the meaning and usage of words in early Christian literature. 

 

Two major classes of inscriptions: epitaphs (grave monuments) and official decrees (by governments or associations).  Most of the papyri finds have come from Egypt, where the dry climate has been conducive to the preservation of this writing material.

 

Languages

Although the first century was a more important period in the history of the Latin language than of the Greek, Greek remained the dominant language in the eastern Mediterranean and the principle language of commerce throughout the Roman world.

Following the conquests of Alexander the Great, throughout the east Greek was the official language, the language of communication between those of different races, and the language of settles in the Greek cities.

 

Palestine was multilingual in the first century- - Greek, various Aramaic dialects, Hebrew, and some Latin- - Greek was clearly the language of choice in order to disseminate a message as widely as possible. 

 

All of the New Testament was written in Greek.  Attic Greek had developed into the so-called “koine” (common or everyday) Greek of the Hellenistic Age.  This developed into Byzantine Greek and finally modern Greek.[4]

 

Philosophers and Poets

Heraclitus and the Logos (Ephesus, 5th – 4th c. BC)- “It is wise to listen not to me but to the word, and to confess that all things are one.”

 

Plato: the Philosopher’s Mission and the Doctrine of Ideas (Athens, 5th c. BC)- Socrates “mouth piece” and disciple.  In his ‘Apology’ he writes about Socrates’ death because “he had corrupted the young men of the city, and did not believe in the gods believed in by the city but had introduced other new divinities”.  Socrates said: “You, my friend, a citizen of the great and mighty and wise city of Athens, are you not ashamed of heaping up the greatest amount of money and honor and reputation, and caring so little about wisdom and truth and the greatest improvement of the soul, which you never regard or heed at all?” 

 

The Earlier Stoics- Stocism was materialist; much more important than this, is the fact that in spirit it was deeply religious and thoroughly moral.  The universe was not a meaningless place, nor was man’s place in it fortuitous.  Man’s duty was to live in accordance with Reason or Natural Law (kata logon) indeed a spark or seed of the universal Reason resided within man (logoj spermatikoj).  The founder of the school was Zeno (c. 336-263 BC) who taught in the Painted Porch (stoa) at Athens.  “The element of all the things which exist is Fire, and the origins of the Fire are Stuff and God.  Both of these are bodily substances: God the active substance, and Stuff the passive substance.”

 

Chrysippus (Stoic Philosopher)- “There can be nothing more inept than the people who suppose that good could have existed without the existence of evil.  Good and evil being antithetical, both must needs subsist in opposition, each serving, as it were, by its contrary pressure as a prop to the other.  No contrary, in fact can exist without its correlative contrary.  How could there be any meaning in ‘justice’ unless there were such things as wrongs?  What is justice but the prevention of injustice?  What could anyone understand by ‘courage’ but for the antithesis of cowardice?…the same may be said of good and evil, felicity and inconvenience, pleasure and pain.”

 

Posidonius- “The cause of the passions- - the cause, that is, of disharmony and of the unhappy life- - is that men do not follow absolutely the daemon that is in them, which is akin to, and has a like nature with, the Power governing the whole cosmos, but turn aside after the lower animal principle, and let it run away with them.”

 

The Two Greatest Ethical Stoics- Epictetus, a slave who was emancipated and ended up living in Rome (c. AD 89) and Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, Emperor of Rome from AD 161 to 180. 

Marcus Aurelius- ‘To Himself’ xii. 35ff: “Not even death can bring terror to him who regards that alone as good which comes in due season, and to whom it is all one whether his acts in obedience to right reason are few or many, and a matter of indifference whether he will look upon the world for a longer or a shorter time.”

 

Aristotle (4th to 3rd c. BC)- From Nicomachean Ethics V, iv. 7-12: “Now the judge restores equality: if we represent the matter by a line divided into two unequal parts, he takes away from the greater segment that portion by which it exceeds one-half the whole line, and adds it to the lesser segment.  When the whole has been divided into two halves, people then say that they ‘have their own’, having got what is equal.  This indeed is the origin of the word dikaion (just): it means dicha (in half), as if one were to pronounce it dichaion; and a dikast (judge) is a dichast (halver).  The equal is a mean by way of arithmetical proportion between the greater and the less.

 

Epicurus (c. 342 – 270 BC)- though often called an atheist, he did not deny the existence of gods, but taught that as beings who themselves enjoy continual bliss they will never cause harm or suffering to men; there is nothing to fear from them, but neither can they be placated or cajoled- - if they listened to all the prayers men offer the whole race would come to an end, so foolish and contradictory are the petitions they would hear.  Pain can never hurt us if our minds are abstracted from them.  Pleasure is the chief good; and it can be attained by those who seek it wisely.  Epicurus was a savior FROM religion.  “When, therefore, we maintain that pleasure is the end, we do not mean the pleasures of profligates and those that consist in sensuality, as is supposed by some who are either ignorant or disagree with us or do not understand, but freedom from pain in the body and from trouble in the mind.  For it is not continuous drinkings and revellings, nor the satisfaction of lusts, nor the enjoyment of fish and other luxuries of the wealthy table, which produce a pleasant life, but sober reasoning, searching out the motives for all choice and avoidance, and banishing mere opinions, to which are due the greatest disturbance of the spirit.”

The philosopher became a street-corner orator, and the Cynics in particular preached their ‘gospel’ to all who would listen, and it was often delivered—and received—less as a reasoned system of beliefs about the universe than as a divine revelation. Epictetus writes: “The true Cynic when he has ordered himself thus cannot be satisfied with this: he must know that he is sent as a messenger from God to men concerning things good and evil, to show them that they have gone astray and are seeking the true nature of good and evil where it is not to be found, and take no thought where it really is: he must realize, in the words of Diogenes when brought before Philip after the battle of Chaeronea, that he is sent ‘to reconnoitre’ (a spy).

 

The Greeks knew how to erect columns and the Romans knew how to bridge space.  Thus may we briefly characterize the major architectural glories still to be seen at classical sites: columns around Greek temples, marketplaces, and public buildings; arches supporting Roman aqueducts, bridges, theatres, triumphal monuments, and at city gates. 

 

Classical sites around the Mediterranean show what were the important public buildings: every city had its temples, marketplaces, theatre, town hall, and gymnasium or baths.

Private houses in the eastern provinces were one-family dwellings up to four stories high.  The dining room on the top floor was the only large room and often opened on a terrace.  This is the “upper room” of Acts 1:13; 9:37; Mark 14:15.

 

Hellenistic-Roman Religions

The Epic Age: Homer- The Iliad is the story of the Trojan war between Greeks (under Agamemnon, king of Mycenae) and the city of Troy; the Odyssey relates the adventures of one of the heroes on his return from the war.  The Homeric poems are a deliberate attempt to reproduce conditions of about 1200 BC at the final stage of Mycenaean civilization just before the Dorian invasions brought the interruption of a “dark age” in the Greek cultural development.”

 

The Greek gods were the most anthropomorphic of the gods of any people with the exception of those in Scandinavian mythology.  The differences between the gods and humans were: they were ageless and deathless; they were not limited by physical restrictions and so could take any shape and go anywhere quickly and invisibly; they could do things (morally speaking) that humans could not do (there mode of operation was amoral).  In Greece the “measure of all things” was man.

 

Greek Name

Roman Name

Description

Zeus

Jupiter

Father of gods and men in a patriarchal sense.  The sky and weather god represented by the thunderbolt.

Hera

Juno

Wife of Zeus, associated with marriage and women.

Poseidon

Neptune

God of sea, water, and earthquakes.  Subduer of horses and brother of Zeus.  Symbol the trident.

Apollo

 

The “all Greek boy” who was the ideal type of young manly beauty, associated with music, archery, prophecy, medicine, flocks and herds, law, civilization, and later the sun.  Lyre and bow his attributes.

Artemis

Diana

Twin sister of Apollo, chaste goddess of the countryside and wild animals, who also presided over childbirth.

Athena

Minerva

Virgin goddess of wisdom, fine and skilled arts, protectress of Athens.  She sprang forth fully armed from the head of Zeus.

Hermes

Mercury

Messenger of the gods who presided over roadways and all who used them.  God of herdsmen, conductor of souls to Hades, divine rogue and trickster who embodied the Greek respect for cleverness.

Ares

Mars

God of war.

Aphrodite

Venus

Goddess of love, beauty and fertility—the personification of the sexual instinct and mother of eros.

Demeter

Ceres

Grain goddess.

Dionysius

Bacchus

Wine god.

Hephaestus

Vulcan

God of fire and so of crafts.

 

Mystery Religions

The Object of the mystery cults was to secure salvation for men who were subject to moral and physical evil, dominated by Destiny, and unable by themselves to escape from the corruption that beset the material side of their nature.  Salvation accordingly meant escape from Destiny, release from corruption and a renewed moral life.  It was effected by what may broadly be called sacramental means.  By taking part in prescribed rites the worshipper became united with God, was enabled in this life to enjoy mystical communion with him, and furth was assured of immortality beyond death.

 

The following are among the most important features of the mystery religions:

The Myth- The saving cycle of events in the experience of the god were recounted in a tale conveniently described as a myth.  Ex. Plutarch’s Myth of Isis and Osiris.

 

Initiation- Rites of initiation opened the way into membership of the cults, and generally seem to have consisted primarily of some ceremonial by means of which the initiand was incorporated into the divine action of the myth, and so achieved life by virtue of the resurrection of the god. Ex. The rite of taurobolium, in which the worshipper was drenched in the blood of a bull (maybe an institution of Mithraism).

 

Worship- The Mystery cults ranged from the licentious to the truly spiritual.

 

Greek Philosophy and Early Christianity

Philosophy in the Hellenistic and Roman periods was not just a mere theoretical study, but a way of life.  The various schools of philosophy in the Roman world provided the worldview and practical guidance for life and practical guidance that religion does for many today.  Ethics was the principle concern of the leading Hellenistic philosophies.  Their aim was to teach people how to live.

 

Plato’s Division of the Soul:  In three parts- 1. The intellectual, or ration; 2. The vibrant, or spirited; 3. The desirous, or appetitive.  Wisdom for the intellectual, courage for the spirited, and self-control for the desirous part.

 

Four Virtues of Plato: Justice, Courage, Self-Control, and Wisdom, these four were given prominence during the Hellenistic Age and became the four natural virtues to which were added the three supernatural virtues: faith, hope, and love to form the seven cardinal virtues of the Middle Ages. 

 

Aristotle’ Thought- Aristotle saw himself as the true successor of Plato.  Plato moved from forms then to specifics, Aristotle started with specifics and tried to group them into ever higher genera.  “By understanding the parts, one may understand the whole.”  Aristotle divided things two ways: as substance, when we see nature in a moment; and as motion, when we see it as a world of change.  Moreover, we may analyze nature into potentiality and actuality.  Substance is what something is in itself; its “accidents” are its attributes, how it is perceived.  Substance is divisible into form and matter.  A statue is marble to which the sculptor has given a shape.  It is matter that has been given a form.  Matter does not exist without form, nor form without matter. 

 

Aristotle’s Understanding of Change- Change is a fact that all observe.  There are four causes of motion or change: 1. Material Cause- the matter out of which something is produced’ 2. Efficient Cause-the active, producing cause. Ex. Parents who produce children; 3. Formal Cause-the technique or way of doing something, the pattern followed.  In nature this is the law of development; 4. Final Cause-the goal or purpose intended.  Everything in nature has an end or purpose. Ex. A kitten to become a cat, an acorn to become an oak.  The sculptor: the marble on which he works is the material cause, the sculptor himself is the efficient cause, the pattern for the statue is the formal cause, and the purpose for which the work is undertaken is the final cause..  Ultimately, change is the development or transition from potentiality to actuality.

 

Aristotle on the Soul- He found three kinds of souls: 1. Nutritive or vegetative souls.  These lowest souls simply possess the principle of life: nutrition, repair and reproduction. This is sheer biological life shared by all living things. 2. Sensitive or animal souls.  In addition to possessing the principle of life, the middle level possesses sensations: senses, impulses, instincts.  The sensitive faculty is the source of desire and motion, which separates animal life from plant life. 3. Thinking or ration souls.  The highest level of life possesses reason or intellect, in addition to all the faculties of the lower souls.  This level is found in human beings alone.

 

The scientists that eventually came from Aristotle’s teaching, went to Alexandria the greatest center of scientific knowledge in the Hellenistic world.  The school of Alexander became known as a research institution.  As soon as his followers lost sight of Aristotle’s conviction of a goal (telos) toward which each of the sciences moved, their efforts became knowledge for its own sake—encyclopedianism. 

 

Skepticism- The Greek word for dogma meant opinion or view, and was the position to which one came after examining something.  To examine without necessarily coming to a decision is skeptesthai.  Plato and Aristotle after examining, dogmatized.  But if one cannot come to a conclusion, then that person suspends judgment.  Skepticism never became and effective school, for it was always negative.  It was not influential on a continuing basis, and the last flowering came at a time when the world was turning to religion.

 

The two principal philosophical schools of the Hellenistic Age were the Stoics and Epicureans (cf. Acts 17:18).  Both were primarily interested in ethics but developed comprehensive explanations of reality that were influential beyond their own circles of adherents.

 

Zeno was the founder of Stoicism.  He started the scientific study of Greek grammar and vocabulary.  He developed a philosophical system of three branches: logic and theory of knowledge, physics and theology, and ethics.  His main concern was securing humanity from fear and disturbance.  According to Zeno, the goal of life is virtue; everything else is indifferent.  Since no one can deprive the wise person of virtue, that person is always in possession of the only true good and is therefore happy (Cleanthes, Chrysippus, Aratus of Soli).  Everyone read Homer and Aratus.  When the Romans translated something from Greek into Latin, Aratus was one of the first.  He expressed Stoicism in a popular poem that was read by all in that time.  The logos became another word in the Stoic system for god, since it maintains order.  This impersonal reason that gives order to the world is thus unlike the Christian conception found in John 1.

 

Roman Stoicism- Had an exclusively ethical and practical concern.  Seneca- gave guidance to the government under Nero.  Tertullian described him as “always our Seneca” (On the Soul 20), and the similarities in thought at places to Christianity prompted the Christian invention of an apocryphal correspondence between Paul and Seneca.  Epictetus- tried to reach the masses with his message.  He taught that the universe is the product of Divine Providence, which continues to be manifest in the world’s unity and order.  He saw the philosopher as an ambassador of the Divine with a mission to teach people how to live, as a physician of souls, a witness for God, a scout.  He emphasized indifference to all things that are not within one’s own self and will as the way to inner freedom.  Marcus Aurelius- He wrote Meditations as emperor (lit. To Himself), the last great written expression of the Stoic view of life.  The reign of Marcus Aurelius was a difficult time for Christians, and the emperor could not understand their readiness for martyrdom, although his own Stoic belief allowed for suicide.  What was of value in Stoicism was absorbed into the Neoplatonic synthesis.

Stoicism and Christianity- Christianity used some of the same terminology that was at home in Stoicism: Spirit, conscience, Logos, virtue, self-sufficiency, freedom of speech, reasonable service, etc.  Despite some of the language (as in Epictetus), Stoicism did not have a fully personal God; it knew only an immanent god.  The God of the Bible is the Creator of the world, never equated with it as in Stoic pantheism.  In Christianity the universe has a beginning, purpose, and end; Stoicism none of these.  For Stoicism, as for all Greek philosophy before Neoplatonism, the goal of humanity is self-liberation, and this goal is attainable.  It did not know the redemptive love of a merciful God.

Epicureanism- Epicurus admitted women and slaves to his community, and this along with his professed hedonism probably was the source of some of the stories that circulated about his school; he was very unpopular and controversial with some of that society.  Epicurus’ philosophy promoted the placid pleasures of the mind, friendship, and contentment.  For him there was no reason to eat, drink, and be merry today if you are going to have a headache from it tomorrow.  Poor health imposed on Epicurus himself a frugal life.  Lucretius- The most important and influential exposition of the Epicurean system has come from the Latin poet Lucretius.  Epicurus was a materialist.  The physical world comes from atoms that operate according to law (Democritus).  Therefore, nature has no purpose.  There is no creation—the world is eternal, for atoms are indestructible though they may be changed.  For Epicurus this physical theory was the fall of religion.  Epicurus’ goal was to achieve peace of mind and tranquility (ataraxia) for all.  He wanted to save humanity from the darkness of religion.  Oracles, divination, magic, etc., are humbug.  He saw religion as a source of fear; therefore the banishing of the gods brought peace and the possibility of a good life.  Diogenes the Epicurean: “Nothing to fear in God; Nothing to feel in Death; Good (pleasure) can be attained; Evil (pain) can be endured.”

The Epicureans and Stoics were the chief rivals for the allegiance of educated people in the Hellenistic Age (cf. Acts 17:18): A group of Epicurean and Stoic philosophers began to dispute with him. Some of them asked, "What is this babbler trying to say?" Others remarked, "He seems to be advocating foreign gods." They said this because Paul was preaching the good news about Jesus and the resurrection.

Both Epicureans and Stoics sought to liberate humans from fate, to make them self-sufficient and indifferent to externals.  Their major concerns—undisturbedness (atarxia) in Epicureanism and passionlessness (apatheia) in Stoicism—were similar, but Stoicism was more stolid.  Stoicism said in effect, “Let us neither eat nor drink, for tomorrow we die.”

 

Eclecticism- to pick and choose.  It refers to the tendency to select elements from different philosophical schools and integrate them into one’s own system of thought or to put them together in new combinations.

 

Middle Platonism- The Platonism from the first century BC to the second century AD is called Middle Platonism.  The development had been prepared for in the move from skepticism to eclecticism by Antiochus of Ascalon.  The first century BC saw a revival of the teaching of Plato and Aristotle.  Middle Platonism proved the intellectual background for the work of the Christian apologists of the second century: Justin Martyr, Tatian, Athenagorus, and Clement of Alexandria.  Plutarch was a Middle Platonist.  Whereas philosophers from the fifth century BC onward had kept a certain distance between themselves and religious tradition, even when friendly toward it, from the end of the first century AD they increasingly looked to religion as a source of enlightenment.  Cicero, Philo of Alexandria, and Plutarch.  For Plutarch, the crown of philosophy is to form true and worthy conceptions of God and to give him pious worship.  His description of God sounds like that of the Christian apologists, but he supported the traditional religion and sought to resolve its contradictions.

 

JEWISH HISTORY

The Persian Period

Cyrus and the Dispersion- Cyrus reversed the policies of the Assyrians:

II Ki 17:1-41

In the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah, Hoshea son of Elah became king of Israel in Samaria, and he reigned nine years.

He did evil in the eyes of the LORD, but not like the kings of Israel who preceded him.

Shalmaneser king of Assyria came up to attack Hoshea, who had been Shalmaneser's vassal and had paid him tribute.

But the king of Assyria discovered that Hoshea was a traitor, for he had sent envoys to So king of Egypt, and he no longer paid tribute to the king of Assyria, as he had done year by year. Therefore Shalmaneser seized him and put him in prison.

The king of Assyria invaded the entire land, marched against Samaria and laid siege to it for three years.

In the ninth year of Hoshea, the king of Assyria captured Samaria and deported the Israelites to Assyria. He settled them in Halah, in Gozan on the Habor River and in the towns of the Medes.

All this took place because the Israelites had sinned against the LORD their God, who had brought them up out of Egypt from under the power of Pharaoh king of Egypt. They worshiped other gods

and followed the practices of the nations the LORD had driven out before them, as well as the practices that the kings of Israel had introduced.

The Israelites secretly did things against the LORD their God that were not right. From watchtower to fortified city they built themselves high places in all their towns.

They set up sacred stones and Asherah poles on every high hill and under every spreading tree.

At every high place they burned incense, as the nations whom the LORD had driven out before them had done. They did wicked things that provoked the LORD to anger.

They worshiped idols, though the LORD had said, "You shall not do this."

The LORD warned Israel and Judah through all his prophets and seers: "Turn from your evil ways. Observe my commands and decrees, in accordance with the entire Law that I commanded your fathers to obey and that I delivered to you through my servants the prophets."

But they would not listen and were as stiff-necked as their fathers, who did not trust in the LORD their God.

They rejected his decrees and the covenant he had made with their fathers and the warnings he had given them. They followed worthless idols and themselves became worthless. They imitated the nations around them although the LORD had ordered them, "Do not do as they do," and they did the things the LORD had forbidden them to do.

They forsook all the commands of the LORD their God and made for themselves two idols cast in the shape of calves, and an Asherah pole. They bowed down to all the starry hosts, and they worshiped Baal.

They sacrificed their sons and daughters in the fire. They practiced divination and sorcery and sold themselves to do evil in the eyes of the LORD, provoking him to anger.

So the LORD was very angry with Israel and removed them from his presence. Only the tribe of Judah was left,

and even Judah did not keep the commands of the LORD their God. They followed the practices Israel had introduced.

Therefore the LORD rejected all the people of Israel; he afflicted them and gave them into the hands of plunderers, until he thrust them from his presence.

When he tore Israel away from the house of David, they made Jeroboam son of Nebat their king. Jeroboam enticed Israel away from following the LORD and caused them to commit a great sin.

The Israelites persisted in all the sins of Jeroboam and did not turn away from them

until the LORD removed them from his presence, as he had warned through all his servants the prophets. So the people of Israel were taken from their homeland into exile in Assyria, and they are still there.

The king of Assyria brought people from Babylon, Cuthah, Avva, Hamath and Sepharvaim and settled them in the towns of Samaria to replace the Israelites. They took over Samaria and lived in its towns.

When they first lived there, they did not worship the LORD; so he sent lions among them and they killed some of the people.

It was reported to the king of Assyria: "The people you deported and resettled in the towns of Samaria do not know what the god of that country requires. He has sent lions among them, which are killing them off, because the people do not know what he requires."

Then the king of Assyria gave this order: "Have one of the priests you took captive from Samaria go back to live there and teach the people what the god of the land requires."

So one of the priests who had been exiled from Samaria came to live in Bethel and taught them how to worship the LORD.

Nevertheless, each national group made its own gods in the several towns where they settled, and set them up in the shrines the people of Samaria had made at the high places.

The men from Babylon made Succoth Benoth, the men from Cuthah made Nergal, and the men from Hamath made Ashima;

the Avvites made Nibhaz and Tartak, and the Sepharvites burned their children in the fire as sacrifices to Adrammelech and Anammelech, the gods of Sepharvaim.

They worshiped the LORD, but they also appointed all sorts of their own people to officiate for them as priests in the shrines at the high places.

They worshiped the LORD, but they also served their own gods in accordance with the customs of the nations from which they had been brought.

To this day they persist in their former practices. They neither worship the LORD nor adhere to the decrees and ordinances, the laws and commands that the LORD gave the descendants of Jacob, whom he named Israel.

When the LORD made a covenant with the Israelites, he commanded them: "Do not worship any other gods or bow down to them, serve them or sacrifice to them.

But the LORD, who brought you up out of Egypt with mighty power and outstretched arm, is the one you must worship. To him you shall bow down and to him offer sacrifices.

You must always be careful to keep the decrees and ordinances, the laws and commands he wrote for you. Do not worship other gods.

Do not forget the covenant I have made with you, and do not worship other gods.

Rather, worship the LORD your God; it is he who will deliver you from the hand of all your enemies."

They would not listen, however, but persisted in their former practices.

Even while these people were worshiping the LORD, they were serving their idols. To this day their children and grandchildren continue to do as their fathers did.

 

Cyrus reversed the policies as well of the Babylonians (2 Kings 24-25) by encouraging peoples to return to their homelands and by supporting local institutions under the oversight of the royal administration.  Many Jews chose to remain in Babylonia.  They had followed the advice of Jeremiah (Chap. 29) and settled down and sought “welfare of the city” to such an extent that they prospered, some even becoming high government officials (as were Daniel, Mordecai, and Nehemiah).  The Babylonian Talmud shows the great prestige later attained by the rabbinic scholars there.

 

Temple and Torah- The two great accomplishments of the returned exiles were the rebuilding of the Lord’s house in Jerusalem and the collecting and studying of the law (Torah) with a view to regulating the life of the people by it.  Those who returned from captivity under the leadership of Zerubbabel the governor and Joshua the priest were encouraged by the prophets Haggai and Zechariah to finish the Second Temple and dedicate it finally in 515 BC (Ezra 1-6).  This began the “Second Temple Period” or the “Second Jewish Commonwealth.” 

 

The Scribes- With the return of Ezra, we are introduced to a new class of religious leaders who were to assume great importance in the subsequent period (Ezra was described as “a scribe skilled in the law of Moses”).  A different kind of “wise man” arose, scholars in the sacred writings.  Scribes replaced priests as the interpreters of the law in the absence of prophetic revelation, scribal interpretation became the authority.  The post-exilic community was dedicated to the study of the law, and its piety revolved around the law so that Jews were a unique people in the ancient world in their effort to educate a whole nation in a book religion.

 

The Province of Judah- It formed a very small area extending no more than twenty miles in any direction from Jerusalem.  It would have appeared to the outsider as simply another one of the temple-states so numerous in the near east.  The local government was “oligarchic and aristocratic” according to Josephus, an the high priests were at the head of affairs.  Satrap’s were the titles given the governors of large administrative areas.  The high priest remained the leader of the Jewish community in Judea through Ptolemaic times.

 

Samaritian Schism- The exiles who returned home felt a social superiority to the “people of the land” who remained around Jerusalem (Jer. 24; 2 Kings 24:14) and a religious and racial superiority to their neighbors to the north around the old capital of the Northern kingdom, Samaria.  Authorities in Samaria opposed the rebuilding of the temple and city walls.  The grandson of the high priest at the time came to Jerusalem and married the daughter of Sanballat, the governor of Samaria, and that he drove out this Samaritan sympathizer (Neh. 13:28).  Josephus says that Sanballat promised the grandson (Manasses) a priesthood and temple on Mt. Gerizim.  A reform movement purified the Samaritan religion, perhaps at the same time as Ezra and Nehemiah, for later the Jewish-Samaritan rivalry had to do with the place of worship, not its ritual, and the Samaritans have continued to recognize the same law book as the Jews (the Pentateuch).

 

The Greek Period

The Coming of Alexander- The coming of the Macedonians accelerated a process of Hellenization already under way in the eastern Mediterranean.  Not only did the Greeks penetrate Palestine, but during the Hellenistic period the Jewish dispersion expanded. 

 

The Rule of the Ptolemies- On Alexander’s death (323 BC) his empire was divided up among his generals.  Ptolemy I transported many Jews to Egypt, and Alexandria became a major center of Jewish dispersion.  During the Ptolemaic period the Old Testament was translated into Greek.

 

The Rule of the Seleucids- Antiochus III the Great brought the period of peace to an end in 219.  He was over Palestine but eventually defeated by the Romans in 190 BC.  Onias III, his brother Jason secured appointment as high priest from Antiochus IV (175-163 BC).  The process of Hellenization accelerated under Jason, in fact the city was renamed Antioch.  The high priest was now a Seleucid official.  Menelaus who represented the extreme Hellenizers was not content with Onias Jason and offered a higher sum of money for the high priesthood.  Antiochus IV, escorted by Menelaus plundered the temple at Jerusalem in 169 BC.  Antiochus IV in 168 BC issued decrees prohibiting the practice of the Jewish religion: the Scriptures were to be destroyed, the Sabbath and festivals were longer to be observed, the food laws were to be abolished, and circumcision was no longer practiced (1 Macc. 1:41-64).  Antiochus IV (called “God Manifest” or Epiphanes) desecrated the temple and offered a swine on the altar in light of the Feast of Dionysius which included the sacrifice of pigs, an unclean animal in the Jewish religion.

 

The Maccabean Period (167-63 BC)

Mattathias- Representatives of the government came to the Judean village of Modin to persuade the priest Mattathias as the leading citizen to set an example by sacrificing to the pagan gods, he refused and killed a Jew who stepped forward to comply; in addition he killed the king’s officer.  Mattathias and his sons fled to the hills of Judea and called upon all those zealous for the law of their fathers to rally to them. 

Judas- After Mattathias’ death leadership was given to his son Judas Maccabee (“the hammer”).  The pious cast their lot w